Board of directors

Professional Board of Directors: Why You Should have one

by Fred Abramson on December 6, 2010

Robert C. Pozen, writing in the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate  Governance and Financial Regulation argues that Sarbanes Oaxley has been largely ineffective.  Many of the largest companies had to be bailed out despite adhering to the rule that  all boards of public companies as well as their important committees would be comprised mainly of independent directors.

Mr. Pozen argues that the problem with current corporate boards is that there are too many directors and too few experts with too much emphasis on procedures.

His solution: creating a small group of professional directors with enough relevant experience and sufficient time to hold management accountable. Makes sense to me, however I disagree with his assessment that Sarbanes Oxley was large contributing factor to the financial crisis.  For example, weak regulation of mortgage backed securities certainly caused more harm than having too many board members.

He argues for a six pronged approach to reforming Sarbanes-Oaxley to include the following:

  1. Smaller size. The current average for a board of directors is 11. He argues that the size allows individual members to skirt responsibility and to hide. A more manageable size would be six members.
  2. Greater experience. There should be more board members that have experience in the business itself.
  3. Increased time commitment. Outside board members should spend 2 days of month with the company and attend six full time board members during the year.
  4. Professional Board Members are hard to find. Since board members with relevant experience are hard to find and often with competing companies. It is suggested that companies should rely on retired executives.
  5. Professional Board Members will be too expensive. It is suggested that the rate of pay be boosted to $400,000.
  6. Professional Directors will have greater legal exposure. Professional directors need to be independent of company management. If directors are independent, state courts will defer heavily to their business judgment about what is best for the company

The Law Office of Frederic R. Abramson represents businesses in New York.  If you have a question about business law, contact me at 212-233-0666.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Directors, Officers and Breach of Fiduciary Duty

by Fred Abramson on November 18, 2010 · 2 comments

If you are an officer or director of a corporation, you stand in a special or fiduciary relationship with both the shareholders and to the corporation itself. This relationship is special because you are placed in a position of trust. If you are a majority shareholder of your company, you have probably the most about your company. You know the assets and liabilities of the company, the number of employees, etc.

With this trust comes a price. You are obligated to act in the best interest of the corporation rather yourself.

However, if you are an employee and don’t hold a position of corporate policy-making authority then you do not owe a fiduciary duty to the company.

Basically, officers and directors have the following 2 basic fiduciary duties:

  1. Diligence. This means that you should act in good faith.
  2. Loyalty. You owe loyalty to the company and not hurt your company for your own self-interest. Officers and directors are prohibited from
  • taking an opportunity away from the company.  If you are an officer of an advertising company, you cannot moonlight by providing search engine optimization services.
  • competition with the company. Can you imagine the CEO of Coke serving on the board of directors of Pepsi?
  • vote on transactions that you have a personal interest. You shouldn’t vote on moving corporate headquarters to a building that you own.
  • sell stock of the company illegally. You don’t need an insider trader action.

If you are a majority shareholder, you also owe a duty of loyalty to your minority shareholders. If you favor one group over the other, you are asking for trouble.  Be aware that if you are both a member of a corporation and a shareholder, you are placed with an even greater degree of fiduciary duty.

The Law Office of Frederic R. Abramson represents businesses in New York. If you have a question regarding breach of fiduciary duty, call me at 212-233-0666.

Enhanced by Zemanta