<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook&#8217;s Law Department is Ready to Brawl over Requests for Information from a User&#8217;s Facebook Account</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nylawblog.com/2010/02/facebooks-law-department-is-ready-to-brawl-over-requests-for-information-from-a-users-facebook-account/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nylawblog.com/2010/02/facebooks-law-department-is-ready-to-brawl-over-requests-for-information-from-a-users-facebook-account/</link>
	<description>Law Office of Frederic R. Abramson &#124;160 Broadway, Ste. 500 &#124; New York, NY 10038 &#124; (212) 233-0666 &#124; fabramson@abramsonlegal.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Chaker</title>
		<link>http://nylawblog.com/2010/02/facebooks-law-department-is-ready-to-brawl-over-requests-for-information-from-a-users-facebook-account/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Chaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nylawblog.com/?p=642#comment-225</guid>
		<description>I take issue with the comment Myspace is &#039;hiding&#039; behind the law. MySpace as well as Facebook is prohibited from lawfully producing the contents of a user’s private mail messages or stored content files held or maintained on behalf of a user to a any non-government entity, by the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) 18 U.S.C. §§ 2702-2703. The materials protected from disclosure by Section 2702(a)(2) include MySpace user content including, but not limited to, friend lists, photos, blogs and private messages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Given the above, it is inevitable unless the supoena fits within the perview of the law, then the subpoena is open to be discarded on a Motion to Quash. The argument whether counsel for MySpace &quot;has kids&quot; is an emotional one the law doesn&#039;t recognize. If a police officer enters a house absent consent or probable cause and finds 10 bodies, the court will toss out the evidence based upon the Fourth Amendment due to a violation of the constitution. Likeewise, despite the allegations made in the lawsuit, if a murderer can go free--your subpoena may be discarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take issue with the comment Myspace is &#39;hiding&#39; behind the law. MySpace as well as Facebook is prohibited from lawfully producing the contents of a user’s private mail messages or stored content files held or maintained on behalf of a user to a any non-government entity, by the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) 18 U.S.C. §§ 2702-2703. The materials protected from disclosure by Section 2702(a)(2) include MySpace user content including, but not limited to, friend lists, photos, blogs and private messages.</p>
<p>Given the above, it is inevitable unless the supoena fits within the perview of the law, then the subpoena is open to be discarded on a Motion to Quash. The argument whether counsel for MySpace &#8220;has kids&#8221; is an emotional one the law doesn&#39;t recognize. If a police officer enters a house absent consent or probable cause and finds 10 bodies, the court will toss out the evidence based upon the Fourth Amendment due to a violation of the constitution. Likeewise, despite the allegations made in the lawsuit, if a murderer can go free&#8211;your subpoena may be discarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Chaker</title>
		<link>http://nylawblog.com/2010/02/facebooks-law-department-is-ready-to-brawl-over-requests-for-information-from-a-users-facebook-account/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Chaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nylawblog.com/?p=642#comment-177</guid>
		<description>I take issue with the comment Myspace is &#039;hiding&#039; behind the law. MySpace as well as Facebook is prohibited from lawfully producing the contents of a user’s private mail messages or stored content files held or maintained on behalf of a user to a any non-government entity, by the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) 18 U.S.C. §§ 2702-2703. The materials protected from disclosure by Section 2702(a)(2) include MySpace user content including, but not limited to, friend lists, photos, blogs and private messages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Given the above, it is inevitable unless the supoena fits within the perview of the law, then the subpoena is open to be discarded on a Motion to Quash. The argument whether counsel for MySpace &quot;has kids&quot; is an emotional one the law doesn&#039;t recognize. If a police officer enters a house absent consent or probable cause and finds 10 bodies, the court will toss out the evidence based upon the Fourth Amendment due to a violation of the constitution. Likeewise, despite the allegations made in the lawsuit, if a murderer can go free--your subpoena may be discarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take issue with the comment Myspace is &#39;hiding&#39; behind the law. MySpace as well as Facebook is prohibited from lawfully producing the contents of a user’s private mail messages or stored content files held or maintained on behalf of a user to a any non-government entity, by the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) 18 U.S.C. §§ 2702-2703. The materials protected from disclosure by Section 2702(a)(2) include MySpace user content including, but not limited to, friend lists, photos, blogs and private messages.</p>
<p>Given the above, it is inevitable unless the supoena fits within the perview of the law, then the subpoena is open to be discarded on a Motion to Quash. The argument whether counsel for MySpace &#8220;has kids&#8221; is an emotional one the law doesn&#39;t recognize. If a police officer enters a house absent consent or probable cause and finds 10 bodies, the court will toss out the evidence based upon the Fourth Amendment due to a violation of the constitution. Likeewise, despite the allegations made in the lawsuit, if a murderer can go free&#8211;your subpoena may be discarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: nylawblog.com @ 2010-07-29 13:55:44 -->